2000 Holden HRT vs. 1996 Mitsubishi L 200
To start off, 2000 Holden HRT is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Mitsubishi L 200. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Mitsubishi L 200 would be higher. At 5,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Holden HRT is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1996 Mitsubishi L 200 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2000 Holden HRT. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Mitsubishi L 200 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Holden HRT (815 Nm) has 569 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Mitsubishi L 200. (246 Nm). This means 2000 Holden HRT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Mitsubishi L 200.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Holden HRT | 1996 Mitsubishi L 200 | |
Make | Holden | Mitsubishi |
Model | HRT | L 200 |
Year Released | 2000 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5000 cc | 2477 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 100 HP |
Torque | 815 Nm | 246 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |