2000 Holden HRT vs. 1996 Morgan 4
To start off, 2000 Holden HRT is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Morgan 4. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Morgan 4 would be higher. At 5,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Holden HRT is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1996 Morgan 4 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1996 Morgan 4. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Holden HRT, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Holden HRT (815 Nm) has 655 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Morgan 4. (160 Nm). This means 2000 Holden HRT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Morgan 4.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Holden HRT | 1996 Morgan 4 | |
| Make | Holden | Morgan |
| Model | HRT | 4 |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1996 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5000 cc | 1794 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 112 HP |
| Torque | 815 Nm | 160 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
