2000 Holden HRT vs. 1997 Honda CR-V
To start off, 2000 Holden HRT is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 Honda CR-V. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 Honda CR-V would be higher. At 5,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Holden HRT is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1997 Honda CR-V is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2000 Holden HRT. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1997 Honda CR-V will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Holden HRT (815 Nm) has 635 more torque (in Nm) than 1997 Honda CR-V. (180 Nm). This means 2000 Holden HRT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1997 Honda CR-V. 1997 Honda CR-V has automatic transmission and 2000 Holden HRT has manual transmission. 2000 Holden HRT will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1997 Honda CR-V will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Holden HRT | 1997 Honda CR-V | |
Make | Holden | Honda |
Model | HRT | CR-V |
Year Released | 2000 | 1997 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5000 cc | 1999 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 128 HP |
Torque | 815 Nm | 180 Nm |
Top Speed | 300 km/hour | 193 km/hour |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |