2000 Holden HRT vs. 1998 Mercedes-Benz SL
To start off, 2000 Holden HRT is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Mercedes-Benz SL. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Mercedes-Benz SL would be higher. At 5,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Holden HRT is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1998 Mercedes-Benz SL is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1998 Mercedes-Benz SL. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Holden HRT, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Holden HRT (815 Nm) has 545 more torque (in Nm) than 1998 Mercedes-Benz SL. (270 Nm). This means 2000 Holden HRT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1998 Mercedes-Benz SL. 1998 Mercedes-Benz SL has automatic transmission and 2000 Holden HRT has manual transmission. 2000 Holden HRT will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1998 Mercedes-Benz SL will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Holden HRT | 1998 Mercedes-Benz SL | |
Make | Holden | Mercedes-Benz |
Model | HRT | SL |
Year Released | 2000 | 1998 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5000 cc | 2799 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 204 HP |
Torque | 815 Nm | 270 Nm |
Top Speed | 300 km/hour | 228 km/hour |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |