2000 Holden HRT vs. 1999 Lincoln LS
To start off, 2000 Holden HRT is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Lincoln LS. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Lincoln LS would be higher. At 5,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Holden HRT is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1999 Lincoln LS is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1999 Lincoln LS. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Holden HRT, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Holden HRT (815 Nm) has 537 more torque (in Nm) than 1999 Lincoln LS. (278 Nm). This means 2000 Holden HRT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1999 Lincoln LS.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Holden HRT | 1999 Lincoln LS | |
| Make | Holden | Lincoln |
| Model | HRT | LS |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1999 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5000 cc | 2967 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 211 HP |
| Torque | 815 Nm | 278 Nm |
| Top Speed | 300 km/hour | 219 km/hour |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
