2000 Holden HRT vs. 1999 Nissan R 390 GT1
To start off, 2000 Holden HRT is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Nissan R 390 GT1. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Nissan R 390 GT1 would be higher.
Because 1999 Nissan R 390 GT1 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1999 Nissan R 390 GT1. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Holden HRT, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Holden HRT (815 Nm) has 178 more torque (in Nm) than 1999 Nissan R 390 GT1. (637 Nm). This means 2000 Holden HRT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1999 Nissan R 390 GT1.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Holden HRT | 1999 Nissan R 390 GT1 | |
Make | Holden | Nissan |
Model | HRT | R 390 GT1 |
Year Released | 2000 | 1999 |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 544 HP |
Torque | 815 Nm | 637 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |