2000 Holden HRT vs. 2001 Panoz Esperante
To start off, 2001 Panoz Esperante is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Holden HRT. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Holden HRT would be higher. At 5,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Holden HRT is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2001 Panoz Esperante is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2001 Panoz Esperante. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Holden HRT, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Holden HRT (815 Nm) has 389 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Panoz Esperante. (426 Nm). This means 2000 Holden HRT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Panoz Esperante.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Holden HRT | 2001 Panoz Esperante | |
| Make | Holden | Panoz |
| Model | HRT | Esperante |
| Year Released | 2000 | 2001 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5000 cc | 4601 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 317 HP |
| Torque | 815 Nm | 426 Nm |
| Top Speed | 300 km/hour | 250 km/hour |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
