2000 Holden HRT vs. 2001 Toyota RSC
To start off, 2001 Toyota RSC is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Holden HRT. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Holden HRT would be higher. At 5,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Holden HRT is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2001 Toyota RSC is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2000 Holden HRT. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Toyota RSC will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Holden HRT (815 Nm) has 531 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Toyota RSC. (284 Nm). This means 2000 Holden HRT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Toyota RSC.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Holden HRT | 2001 Toyota RSC | |
Make | Holden | Toyota |
Model | HRT | RSC |
Year Released | 2000 | 2001 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5000 cc | 4164 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 194 HP |
Torque | 815 Nm | 284 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |