2000 Holden HRT vs. 2002 Mercedes-Benz SL
To start off, 2002 Mercedes-Benz SL is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Holden HRT. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Holden HRT would be higher. At 5,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Holden HRT is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2002 Mercedes-Benz SL is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2002 Mercedes-Benz SL. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Holden HRT, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Holden HRT (815 Nm) has 465 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Mercedes-Benz SL. (350 Nm). This means 2000 Holden HRT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Mercedes-Benz SL.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Holden HRT | 2002 Mercedes-Benz SL | |
| Make | Holden | Mercedes-Benz |
| Model | HRT | SL |
| Year Released | 2000 | 2002 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5000 cc | 3724 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 242 HP |
| Torque | 815 Nm | 350 Nm |
| Top Speed | 300 km/hour | 250 km/hour |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
