2000 Holden HRT vs. 2003 Jaguar X-Type
To start off, 2003 Jaguar X-Type is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Holden HRT. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Holden HRT would be higher. At 5,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Holden HRT is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2003 Jaguar X-Type is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2000 Holden HRT. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Jaguar X-Type will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Holden HRT (815 Nm) has 571 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Jaguar X-Type. (244 Nm). This means 2000 Holden HRT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Jaguar X-Type.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Holden HRT | 2003 Jaguar X-Type | |
Make | Holden | Jaguar |
Model | HRT | X-Type |
Year Released | 2000 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5000 cc | 2495 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 202 HP |
Torque | 815 Nm | 244 Nm |
Top Speed | 300 km/hour | 222 km/hour |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |