2000 Holden HRT vs. 2003 Mitsubishi Pajero
To start off, 2003 Mitsubishi Pajero is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Holden HRT. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Holden HRT would be higher. At 5,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Holden HRT is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2003 Mitsubishi Pajero is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2000 Holden HRT. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Mitsubishi Pajero will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Holden HRT (815 Nm) has 560 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Mitsubishi Pajero. (255 Nm). This means 2000 Holden HRT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Mitsubishi Pajero.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Holden HRT | 2003 Mitsubishi Pajero | |
| Make | Holden | Mitsubishi |
| Model | HRT | Pajero |
| Year Released | 2000 | 2003 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5000 cc | 2971 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 175 HP |
| Torque | 815 Nm | 255 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
