2000 Holden HRT vs. 2003 Saleen S7
To start off, 2003 Saleen S7 is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Holden HRT. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Holden HRT would be higher. At 7,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2003 Saleen S7 is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2003 Saleen S7 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2003 Saleen S7. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Holden HRT, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Holden HRT | 2003 Saleen S7 | |
| Make | Holden | Saleen |
| Model | HRT | S7 |
| Year Released | 2000 | 2003 |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Size | 5000 cc | 7000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 550 HP |
| Top Speed | 300 km/hour | 322 km/hour |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
