2000 Holden HRT vs. 2004 Lincoln Navigator
To start off, 2004 Lincoln Navigator is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Holden HRT. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Holden HRT would be higher. At 5,406 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Lincoln Navigator is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2004 Lincoln Navigator is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2004 Lincoln Navigator. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Holden HRT, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Holden HRT (815 Nm) has 334 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Lincoln Navigator. (481 Nm). This means 2000 Holden HRT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Lincoln Navigator.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Holden HRT | 2004 Lincoln Navigator | |
Make | Holden | Lincoln |
Model | HRT | Navigator |
Year Released | 2000 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5000 cc | 5406 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 300 HP |
Torque | 815 Nm | 481 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |