2000 Holden HRT vs. 2004 Subaru Outback
To start off, 2004 Subaru Outback is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Holden HRT. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Holden HRT would be higher. At 5,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Holden HRT is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2004 Subaru Outback is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2000 Holden HRT. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Subaru Outback will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Holden HRT (815 Nm) has 530 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Subaru Outback. (285 Nm). This means 2000 Holden HRT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Subaru Outback.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Holden HRT | 2004 Subaru Outback | |
Make | Holden | Subaru |
Model | HRT | Outback |
Year Released | 2000 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5000 cc | 2999 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | boxer |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 213 HP |
Torque | 815 Nm | 285 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |