2000 Holden HRT vs. 2005 Nissan Hardbody
To start off, 2005 Nissan Hardbody is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Holden HRT. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Holden HRT would be higher. At 5,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Holden HRT is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2005 Nissan Hardbody is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2000 Holden HRT. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Nissan Hardbody will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Holden HRT (815 Nm) has 607 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Nissan Hardbody. (208 Nm). This means 2000 Holden HRT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Nissan Hardbody.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Holden HRT | 2005 Nissan Hardbody | |
Make | Holden | Nissan |
Model | HRT | Hardbody |
Year Released | 2000 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5000 cc | 2389 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 138 HP |
Torque | 815 Nm | 208 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |