2000 Holden HRT vs. 2005 Pagani Zonda
To start off, 2005 Pagani Zonda is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Holden HRT. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Holden HRT would be higher. At 7,010 cc (12 cylinders), 2005 Pagani Zonda is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2005 Pagani Zonda is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2005 Pagani Zonda. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Holden HRT, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Holden HRT | 2005 Pagani Zonda | |
| Make | Holden | Pagani |
| Model | HRT | Zonda |
| Year Released | 2000 | 2005 |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Size | 5000 cc | 7010 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 12 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 542 HP |
| Top Speed | 300 km/hour | 335 km/hour |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
