2000 Holden HRT vs. 2006 Lincoln Navigator
To start off, 2006 Lincoln Navigator is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Holden HRT. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Holden HRT would be higher. At 5,408 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Lincoln Navigator is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2006 Lincoln Navigator is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2000 Holden HRT. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Lincoln Navigator will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Holden HRT (815 Nm) has 320 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Lincoln Navigator. (495 Nm). This means 2000 Holden HRT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Lincoln Navigator.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Holden HRT | 2006 Lincoln Navigator | |
| Make | Holden | Lincoln |
| Model | HRT | Navigator |
| Year Released | 2000 | 2006 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5000 cc | 5408 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 300 HP |
| Torque | 815 Nm | 495 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
