2000 Holden HRT vs. 2007 Jeep Commander
To start off, 2007 Jeep Commander is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Holden HRT. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Holden HRT would be higher. At 5,653 cc (8 cylinders), 2007 Jeep Commander is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2007 Jeep Commander is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2000 Holden HRT. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2007 Jeep Commander will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Holden HRT (815 Nm) has 306 more torque (in Nm) than 2007 Jeep Commander. (509 Nm). This means 2000 Holden HRT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2007 Jeep Commander. 2007 Jeep Commander has automatic transmission and 2000 Holden HRT has manual transmission. 2000 Holden HRT will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2007 Jeep Commander will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Holden HRT | 2007 Jeep Commander | |
Make | Holden | Jeep |
Model | HRT | Commander |
Year Released | 2000 | 2007 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5000 cc | 5653 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 330 HP |
Torque | 815 Nm | 509 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |