2000 Holden HRT vs. 2009 Nissan GT-R
To start off, 2009 Nissan GT-R is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Holden HRT. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Holden HRT would be higher. At 5,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Holden HRT is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2009 Nissan GT-R is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2000 Holden HRT. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Nissan GT-R will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Holden HRT (815 Nm) has 227 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Nissan GT-R. (588 Nm). This means 2000 Holden HRT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Nissan GT-R. 2009 Nissan GT-R has automatic transmission and 2000 Holden HRT has manual transmission. 2000 Holden HRT will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2009 Nissan GT-R will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Holden HRT | 2009 Nissan GT-R | |
Make | Holden | Nissan |
Model | HRT | GT-R |
Year Released | 2000 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5000 cc | 3797 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 478 HP |
Torque | 815 Nm | 588 Nm |
Top Speed | 300 km/hour | 310 km/hour |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |