2000 Holden HRT vs. 2010 Jaguar XF
To start off, 2010 Jaguar XF is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Holden HRT. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Holden HRT would be higher. Both 2000 Holden HRT and 2010 Jaguar XF are equipped with a 5,000 cc engine.
Because 2010 Jaguar XF is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2010 Jaguar XF. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Holden HRT, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Holden HRT (815 Nm) has 241 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Jaguar XF. (574 Nm). This means 2000 Holden HRT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Jaguar XF. 2010 Jaguar XF has automatic transmission and 2000 Holden HRT has manual transmission. 2000 Holden HRT will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2010 Jaguar XF will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Holden HRT | 2010 Jaguar XF | |
Make | Holden | Jaguar |
Model | HRT | XF |
Year Released | 2000 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5000 cc | 5000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 470 HP |
Torque | 815 Nm | 574 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |