2000 Holden HRT vs. 2011 Chevrolet Camaro
To start off, 2011 Chevrolet Camaro is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Holden HRT. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Holden HRT would be higher. At 6,200 cc (8 cylinders), 2011 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2011 Chevrolet Camaro is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2011 Chevrolet Camaro. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Holden HRT, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Holden HRT (815 Nm) has 246 more torque (in Nm) than 2011 Chevrolet Camaro. (569 Nm). This means 2000 Holden HRT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2011 Chevrolet Camaro.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Holden HRT | 2011 Chevrolet Camaro | |
| Make | Holden | Chevrolet |
| Model | HRT | Camaro |
| Year Released | 2000 | 2011 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5000 cc | 6200 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 426 HP |
| Torque | 815 Nm | 569 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
