2000 Holden HRT vs. 2011 Koenigsegg Agera
To start off, 2011 Koenigsegg Agera is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Holden HRT. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Holden HRT would be higher. Both 2000 Holden HRT and 2011 Koenigsegg Agera are equipped with a 5,000 cc engine.
Because 2011 Koenigsegg Agera is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2011 Koenigsegg Agera. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Holden HRT, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Holden HRT | 2011 Koenigsegg Agera | |
Make | Holden | Koenigsegg |
Model | HRT | Agera |
Year Released | 2000 | 2011 |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 5000 cc | 5000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 1100 HP |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |