2000 Holden HRT vs. 2011 Land Rover LR4
To start off, 2011 Land Rover LR4 is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Holden HRT. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Holden HRT would be higher. Both 2000 Holden HRT and 2011 Land Rover LR4 are equipped with a 5,000 cc engine.
Because 2011 Land Rover LR4 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2000 Holden HRT. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Land Rover LR4 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Holden HRT (815 Nm) has 307 more torque (in Nm) than 2011 Land Rover LR4. (508 Nm). This means 2000 Holden HRT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2011 Land Rover LR4. 2011 Land Rover LR4 has automatic transmission and 2000 Holden HRT has manual transmission. 2000 Holden HRT will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2011 Land Rover LR4 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Holden HRT | 2011 Land Rover LR4 | |
| Make | Holden | Land Rover |
| Model | HRT | LR4 |
| Year Released | 2000 | 2011 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5000 cc | 5000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 375 HP |
| Torque | 815 Nm | 508 Nm |
| Top Speed | 300 km/hour | 195 km/hour |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
