2000 Holden HRT vs. 2012 Ford F-150
To start off, 2012 Ford F-150 is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Holden HRT. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Holden HRT would be higher. At 6,200 cc (8 cylinders), 2012 Ford F-150 is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2012 Ford F-150 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2012 Ford F-150. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Holden HRT, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Holden HRT (815 Nm) has 227 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Ford F-150. (588 Nm). This means 2000 Holden HRT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Ford F-150. 2012 Ford F-150 has automatic transmission and 2000 Holden HRT has manual transmission. 2000 Holden HRT will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2012 Ford F-150 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Holden HRT | 2012 Ford F-150 | |
| Make | Holden | Ford |
| Model | HRT | F-150 |
| Year Released | 2000 | 2012 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5000 cc | 6200 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 411 HP |
| Torque | 815 Nm | 588 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed shiftable automatic |
