2000 Holden HRT vs. 2012 Nissan Cube
To start off, 2012 Nissan Cube is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Holden HRT. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Holden HRT would be higher. At 5,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Holden HRT is equipped with a bigger engine.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Holden HRT (815 Nm) has 643 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Nissan Cube. (172 Nm). This means 2000 Holden HRT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Nissan Cube.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Holden HRT | 2012 Nissan Cube | |
| Make | Holden | Nissan |
| Model | HRT | Cube |
| Year Released | 2000 | 2012 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5000 cc | 1800 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 122 HP |
| Torque | 815 Nm | 172 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
