2000 Holden HRT vs. 2012 Nissan Cube

To start off, 2012 Nissan Cube is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Holden HRT. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Holden HRT would be higher. At 5,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Holden HRT is equipped with a bigger engine.

Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Holden HRT (815 Nm) has 643 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Nissan Cube. (172 Nm). This means 2000 Holden HRT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Nissan Cube.

Compare all specifications:

2000 Holden HRT 2012 Nissan Cube
Make Holden Nissan
Model HRT Cube
Year Released 2000 2012
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 5000 cc 1800 cc
Engine Cylinders 8 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Horse Power 0 HP 122 HP
Torque 815 Nm 172 Nm
Drive Type Front Front
Transmission Type Manual Manual


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]