2000 Holden HRT vs. 2012 Zenvo ST1
To start off, 2012 Zenvo ST1 is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Holden HRT. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Holden HRT would be higher. At 7,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2012 Zenvo ST1 is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2012 Zenvo ST1 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2012 Zenvo ST1. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Holden HRT, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Zenvo ST1 (1,430 Nm) has 615 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Holden HRT. (815 Nm). This means 2012 Zenvo ST1 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Holden HRT.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Holden HRT | 2012 Zenvo ST1 | |
| Make | Holden | Zenvo |
| Model | HRT | ST1 |
| Year Released | 2000 | 2012 |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Size | 5000 cc | 7000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 1104 HP |
| Torque | 815 Nm | 1430 Nm |
| Top Speed | 300 km/hour | 375 km/hour |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
