2000 Holden HRT vs. 2013 Lotus Evora

To start off, 2013 Lotus Evora is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Holden HRT. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Holden HRT would be higher.

Because 2013 Lotus Evora is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2013 Lotus Evora. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Holden HRT, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Holden HRT (815 Nm) has 465 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Lotus Evora. (350 Nm). This means 2000 Holden HRT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Lotus Evora. 2013 Lotus Evora has automatic transmission and 2000 Holden HRT has manual transmission. 2000 Holden HRT will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2013 Lotus Evora will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: