2000 Holden HRT vs. 2013 Mercedes-Benz S
To start off, 2013 Mercedes-Benz S is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Holden HRT. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Holden HRT would be higher. At 5,500 cc (8 cylinders), 2013 Mercedes-Benz S is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2013 Mercedes-Benz S is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2013 Mercedes-Benz S. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Holden HRT, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Holden HRT (815 Nm) has 15 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Mercedes-Benz S. (800 Nm). This means 2000 Holden HRT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Mercedes-Benz S.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Holden HRT | 2013 Mercedes-Benz S | |
| Make | Holden | Mercedes-Benz |
| Model | HRT | S |
| Year Released | 2000 | 2013 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5000 cc | 5500 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 529 HP |
| Torque | 815 Nm | 800 Nm |
| Top Speed | 300 km/hour | 250 km/hour |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | CVT |
