2000 Holden HRT vs. 2013 Nissan Pathfinder
To start off, 2013 Nissan Pathfinder is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Holden HRT. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Holden HRT would be higher. At 5,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Holden HRT is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2013 Nissan Pathfinder is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2000 Holden HRT. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Nissan Pathfinder will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Holden HRT (815 Nm) has 490 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Nissan Pathfinder. (325 Nm). This means 2000 Holden HRT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Nissan Pathfinder.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Holden HRT | 2013 Nissan Pathfinder | |
| Make | Holden | Nissan |
| Model | HRT | Pathfinder |
| Year Released | 2000 | 2013 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5000 cc | 3500 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 256 HP |
| Torque | 815 Nm | 325 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | CVT |
