2000 Holden Vectra vs. 1954 Studebaker Champion
To start off, 2000 Holden Vectra is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Studebaker Champion. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Studebaker Champion would be higher. At 3,032 cc (8 cylinders), 1954 Studebaker Champion is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Holden Vectra (140 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 40 more horse power than 1954 Studebaker Champion. (100 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Holden Vectra should accelerate faster than 1954 Studebaker Champion. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1954 Studebaker Champion weights approximately 80 kg more than 2000 Holden Vectra.
Because 1954 Studebaker Champion is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1954 Studebaker Champion. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Holden Vectra, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Holden Vectra | 1954 Studebaker Champion | |
| Make | Holden | Studebaker |
| Model | Vectra | Champion |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1954 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2198 cc | 3032 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 140 HP | 100 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1300 kg | 1380 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 5150 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1770 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1530 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 2970 mm |
