2000 Holden Vectra vs. 1981 Volvo 240
To start off, 2000 Holden Vectra is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Volvo 240. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Volvo 240 would be higher. At 2,314 cc (4 cylinders), 1981 Volvo 240 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Holden Vectra (140 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 29 more horse power than 1981 Volvo 240. (111 HP @ 5400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Holden Vectra should accelerate faster than 1981 Volvo 240.
Because 1981 Volvo 240 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1981 Volvo 240. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Holden Vectra, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Holden Vectra (200 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 15 more torque (in Nm) than 1981 Volvo 240. (185 Nm @ 2750 RPM). This means 2000 Holden Vectra will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1981 Volvo 240.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Holden Vectra | 1981 Volvo 240 | |
Make | Holden | Volvo |
Model | Vectra | 240 |
Year Released | 2000 | 1981 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2198 cc | 2314 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 140 HP | 111 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 5400 RPM |
Torque | 200 Nm | 185 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 2750 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1300 kg | 1300 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 4790 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1730 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 2660 mm |