2000 Holden Vectra vs. 1982 Toyota Celica
To start off, 2000 Holden Vectra is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Toyota Celica. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Toyota Celica would be higher. At 2,563 cc, 1982 Toyota Celica is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Holden Vectra (140 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 21 more horse power than 1982 Toyota Celica. (119 HP @ 5400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Holden Vectra should accelerate faster than 1982 Toyota Celica. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Holden Vectra weights approximately 120 kg more than 1982 Toyota Celica. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1982 Toyota Celica (215 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 15 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Holden Vectra. (200 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1982 Toyota Celica will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Holden Vectra.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Holden Vectra | 1982 Toyota Celica | |
| Make | Holden | Toyota |
| Model | Vectra | Celica |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1982 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2198 cc | 2563 cc |
| Horse Power | 140 HP | 119 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 5400 RPM |
| Torque | 200 Nm | 215 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 3600 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 1300 kg | 1180 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 4610 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1660 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1320 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 2640 mm |
