2000 Holden Vectra vs. 2004 Westfield XTR 2
To start off, 2004 Westfield XTR 2 is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Holden Vectra. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Holden Vectra would be higher. At 2,198 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Holden Vectra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Westfield XTR 2 (173 HP @ 9800 RPM) has 33 more horse power than 2000 Holden Vectra. (140 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Westfield XTR 2 should accelerate faster than 2000 Holden Vectra. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Holden Vectra weights approximately 856 kg more than 2004 Westfield XTR 2.
Because 2004 Westfield XTR 2 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2004 Westfield XTR 2. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Holden Vectra, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Holden Vectra | 2004 Westfield XTR 2 | |
| Make | Holden | Westfield |
| Model | Vectra | XTR 2 |
| Year Released | 2000 | 2004 |
| Engine Size | 2198 cc | 1299 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 140 HP | 173 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 9800 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1300 kg | 444 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 3690 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1630 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 2320 mm |
