2000 Holden Vectra vs. 2011 Mitsubishi i-MiEV
To start off, 2011 Mitsubishi i-MiEV is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Holden Vectra. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Holden Vectra would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Holden Vectra weights approximately 220 kg more than 2011 Mitsubishi i-MiEV.
Because 2011 Mitsubishi i-MiEV is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2011 Mitsubishi i-MiEV. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Holden Vectra, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Holden Vectra | 2011 Mitsubishi i-MiEV | |
| Make | Holden | Mitsubishi |
| Model | Vectra | i-MiEV |
| Year Released | 2000 | 2011 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Horse Power | 140 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Electric |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Single Speed |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1300 kg | 1080 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 3395 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1475 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1600 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 2550 mm |
