2000 Holden Vectra vs. 2011 Nissan Rogue
To start off, 2011 Nissan Rogue is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Holden Vectra. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Holden Vectra would be higher. At 2,500 cc (4 cylinders), 2011 Nissan Rogue is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Nissan Rogue (170 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 30 more horse power than 2000 Holden Vectra. (140 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Nissan Rogue should accelerate faster than 2000 Holden Vectra.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Nissan Rogue (237 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 37 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Holden Vectra. (200 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2011 Nissan Rogue will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Holden Vectra.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Holden Vectra | 2011 Nissan Rogue | |
Make | Holden | Nissan |
Model | Vectra | Rogue |
Year Released | 2000 | 2011 |
Body Type | Sedan | Crossover |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2198 cc | 2500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 140 HP | 170 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 200 Nm | 237 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | CVT |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 4681 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1801 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1659 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 2690 mm |