2000 Honda Civic vs. 1958 Lotus 16
To start off, 2000 Honda Civic is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Lotus 16. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Lotus 16 would be higher. At 2,500 cc (4 cylinders), 1958 Lotus 16 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1958 Lotus 16 (238 HP @ 6750 RPM) has 130 more horse power than 2000 Honda Civic. (108 HP @ 6500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1958 Lotus 16 should accelerate faster than 2000 Honda Civic. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Honda Civic weights approximately 610 kg more than 1958 Lotus 16.
Because 2000 Honda Civic is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1958 Lotus 16. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Honda Civic will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2000 Honda Civic has automatic transmission and 1958 Lotus 16 has manual transmission. 1958 Lotus 16 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2000 Honda Civic will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Honda Civic | 1958 Lotus 16 | |
Make | Honda | Lotus |
Model | Civic | 16 |
Year Released | 2000 | 1958 |
Engine Size | 1493 cc | 2500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 108 HP | 238 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 6750 RPM |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1160 kg | 550 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 3510 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2260 mm |