2000 Honda Civic vs. 1960 Mini MK I
To start off, 2000 Honda Civic is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Mini MK I. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Mini MK I would be higher. At 1,750 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Honda Civic is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Honda Civic (128 HP @ 6600 RPM) has 94 more horse power than 1960 Mini MK I. (34 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Honda Civic should accelerate faster than 1960 Mini MK I. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Honda Civic weights approximately 525 kg more than 1960 Mini MK I. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Honda Civic (155 Nm @ 4800 RPM) has 95 more torque (in Nm) than 1960 Mini MK I. (60 Nm @ 2900 RPM). This means 2000 Honda Civic will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1960 Mini MK I.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Honda Civic | 1960 Mini MK I | |
| Make | Honda | Mini |
| Model | Civic | MK I |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1960 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1750 cc | 848 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 128 HP | 34 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6600 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 155 Nm | 60 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4800 RPM | 2900 RPM |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1140 kg | 615 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 3060 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1420 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1360 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2040 mm |
