2000 Honda Civic vs. 1983 Ford Ranger
To start off, 2000 Honda Civic is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Ford Ranger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Ford Ranger would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 1983 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1983 Ford Ranger (145 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 41 more horse power than 2000 Honda Civic. (104 HP @ 5800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1983 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 2000 Honda Civic.
Because 1983 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2000 Honda Civic. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1983 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Honda Civic | 1983 Ford Ranger | |
Make | Honda | Ford |
Model | Civic | Ranger |
Year Released | 2000 | 1983 |
Body Type | Sedan | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1491 cc | 3000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 104 HP | 145 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 4690 mm |