2000 Honda FCX vs. 1950 Maserati 4CLT
To start off, 2000 Honda FCX is newer by 50 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Maserati 4CLT. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Maserati 4CLT would be higher. At 1,488 cc (4 cylinders), 1950 Maserati 4CLT is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1950 Maserati 4CLT (276 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 154 more horse power than 2000 Honda FCX. (122 HP @ 6600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1950 Maserati 4CLT should accelerate faster than 2000 Honda FCX. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Honda FCX weights approximately 220 kg more than 1950 Maserati 4CLT.
Because 1950 Maserati 4CLT is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1950 Maserati 4CLT. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Honda FCX, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2000 Honda FCX has automatic transmission and 1950 Maserati 4CLT has manual transmission. 1950 Maserati 4CLT will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2000 Honda FCX will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Honda FCX | 1950 Maserati 4CLT | |
Make | Honda | Maserati |
Model | FCX | 4CLT |
Year Released | 2000 | 1950 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 999 cc | 1488 cc |
Engine Type | electric | in-line |
Horse Power | 122 HP | 276 HP |
Engine RPM | 6600 RPM | 7000 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 840 kg | 620 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2510 mm |