2000 Honda FCX vs. 1962 Seat 600
To start off, 2000 Honda FCX is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Seat 600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Seat 600 would be higher. At 999 cc, 2000 Honda FCX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Honda FCX (122 HP @ 6600 RPM) has 103 more horse power than 1962 Seat 600. (19 HP @ 4600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Honda FCX should accelerate faster than 1962 Seat 600. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Honda FCX weights approximately 265 kg more than 1962 Seat 600. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1962 Seat 600 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1962 Seat 600. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Honda FCX, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Honda FCX (273 Nm) has 233 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Seat 600. (40 Nm). This means 2000 Honda FCX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Seat 600.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Honda FCX | 1962 Seat 600 | |
Make | Honda | Seat |
Model | FCX | 600 |
Year Released | 2000 | 1962 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 999 cc | 597 cc |
Engine Type | electric | in-line |
Horse Power | 122 HP | 19 HP |
Engine RPM | 6600 RPM | 4600 RPM |
Torque | 273 Nm | 40 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 840 kg | 575 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2010 mm |