2000 Honda FCX vs. 1967 Triumph 1300
To start off, 2000 Honda FCX is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Triumph 1300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Triumph 1300 would be higher. At 1,296 cc (4 cylinders), 1967 Triumph 1300 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Honda FCX (122 HP @ 6600 RPM) has 62 more horse power than 1967 Triumph 1300. (60 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Honda FCX should accelerate faster than 1967 Triumph 1300. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1967 Triumph 1300 weights approximately 78 kg more than 2000 Honda FCX.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Honda FCX (273 Nm) has 174 more torque (in Nm) than 1967 Triumph 1300. (99 Nm). This means 2000 Honda FCX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1967 Triumph 1300.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Honda FCX | 1967 Triumph 1300 | |
Make | Honda | Triumph |
Model | FCX | 1300 |
Year Released | 2000 | 1967 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 999 cc | 1296 cc |
Engine Type | electric | in-line |
Horse Power | 122 HP | 60 HP |
Engine RPM | 6600 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 273 Nm | 99 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 840 kg | 918 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2460 mm |