2000 Honda FCX vs. 1971 Mazda RX-2
To start off, 2000 Honda FCX is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1971 Mazda RX-2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1971 Mazda RX-2 would be higher. At 2,292 cc, 1971 Mazda RX-2 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Honda FCX (122 HP @ 6600 RPM) has 4 more horse power than 1971 Mazda RX-2. (118 HP @ 6500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Honda FCX should accelerate faster than 1971 Mazda RX-2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1971 Mazda RX-2 weights approximately 120 kg more than 2000 Honda FCX.
Because 1971 Mazda RX-2 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1971 Mazda RX-2. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Honda FCX, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Honda FCX (273 Nm) has 115 more torque (in Nm) than 1971 Mazda RX-2. (158 Nm). This means 2000 Honda FCX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1971 Mazda RX-2.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Honda FCX | 1971 Mazda RX-2 | |
| Make | Honda | Mazda |
| Model | FCX | RX-2 |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1971 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 999 cc | 2292 cc |
| Engine Type | electric | dual-disk rotary |
| Horse Power | 122 HP | 118 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6600 RPM | 6500 RPM |
| Torque | 273 Nm | 158 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 840 kg | 960 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2480 mm |
