2000 Honda FCX vs. 1973 Triumph Stag

To start off, 2000 Honda FCX is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1973 Triumph Stag. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1973 Triumph Stag would be higher. At 2,997 cc (8 cylinders), 1973 Triumph Stag is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1973 Triumph Stag (124 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 2 more horse power than 2000 Honda FCX. (122 HP @ 6600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1973 Triumph Stag should accelerate faster than 2000 Honda FCX. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1973 Triumph Stag weights approximately 360 kg more than 2000 Honda FCX. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1973 Triumph Stag is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1973 Triumph Stag. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Honda FCX, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Honda FCX (273 Nm) has 81 more torque (in Nm) than 1973 Triumph Stag. (192 Nm). This means 2000 Honda FCX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1973 Triumph Stag. 2000 Honda FCX has automatic transmission and 1973 Triumph Stag has manual transmission. 1973 Triumph Stag will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2000 Honda FCX will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: