2000 Honda FCX vs. 1979 Volvo 164
To start off, 2000 Honda FCX is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1979 Volvo 164. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1979 Volvo 164 would be higher. At 2,664 cc (6 cylinders), 1979 Volvo 164 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1979 Volvo 164 (138 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 16 more horse power than 2000 Honda FCX. (122 HP @ 6600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1979 Volvo 164 should accelerate faster than 2000 Honda FCX.
Because 1979 Volvo 164 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1979 Volvo 164. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Honda FCX, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Honda FCX (273 Nm) has 68 more torque (in Nm) than 1979 Volvo 164. (205 Nm). This means 2000 Honda FCX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1979 Volvo 164.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Honda FCX | 1979 Volvo 164 | |
| Make | Honda | Volvo |
| Model | FCX | 164 |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1979 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 999 cc | 2664 cc |
| Engine Type | electric | in-line |
| Horse Power | 122 HP | 138 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6600 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 273 Nm | 205 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 3350 mm |
