2000 Honda FCX vs. 1989 Oldsmobile Cutlass
To start off, 2000 Honda FCX is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1989 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1989 Oldsmobile Cutlass would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 1989 Oldsmobile Cutlass is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1989 Oldsmobile Cutlass (164 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 42 more horse power than 2000 Honda FCX. (122 HP @ 6600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1989 Oldsmobile Cutlass should accelerate faster than 2000 Honda FCX. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1989 Oldsmobile Cutlass weights approximately 360 kg more than 2000 Honda FCX. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Honda FCX (273 Nm) has 36 more torque (in Nm) than 1989 Oldsmobile Cutlass. (237 Nm). This means 2000 Honda FCX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1989 Oldsmobile Cutlass.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Honda FCX | 1989 Oldsmobile Cutlass | |
Make | Honda | Oldsmobile |
Model | FCX | Cutlass |
Year Released | 2000 | 1989 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 999 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Type | electric | in-line |
Horse Power | 122 HP | 164 HP |
Engine RPM | 6600 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 273 Nm | 237 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 840 kg | 1200 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2630 mm |