2000 Honda FCX vs. 1995 Mazda MX-3
To start off, 2000 Honda FCX is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Mazda MX-3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Mazda MX-3 would be higher. At 1,598 cc (4 cylinders), 1995 Mazda MX-3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Honda FCX (122 HP @ 6600 RPM) has 16 more horse power than 1995 Mazda MX-3. (106 HP @ 6200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Honda FCX should accelerate faster than 1995 Mazda MX-3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1995 Mazda MX-3 weights approximately 219 kg more than 2000 Honda FCX.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Honda FCX (273 Nm) has 139 more torque (in Nm) than 1995 Mazda MX-3. (134 Nm). This means 2000 Honda FCX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1995 Mazda MX-3. 2000 Honda FCX has automatic transmission and 1995 Mazda MX-3 has manual transmission. 1995 Mazda MX-3 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2000 Honda FCX will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Honda FCX | 1995 Mazda MX-3 | |
| Make | Honda | Mazda |
| Model | FCX | MX-3 |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1995 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 999 cc | 1598 cc |
| Engine Type | electric | in-line |
| Horse Power | 122 HP | 106 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6600 RPM | 6200 RPM |
| Torque | 273 Nm | 134 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 840 kg | 1059 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2460 mm |
