2000 Honda FCX vs. 1996 Lotus Elan

To start off, 2000 Honda FCX is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Lotus Elan. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Lotus Elan would be higher. At 1,588 cc (4 cylinders), 1996 Lotus Elan is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Lotus Elan (163 HP @ 6600 RPM) has 41 more horse power than 2000 Honda FCX. (122 HP @ 6600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Lotus Elan should accelerate faster than 2000 Honda FCX. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Lotus Elan weights approximately 180 kg more than 2000 Honda FCX. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Honda FCX (273 Nm) has 69 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Lotus Elan. (204 Nm). This means 2000 Honda FCX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Lotus Elan. 2000 Honda FCX has automatic transmission and 1996 Lotus Elan has manual transmission. 1996 Lotus Elan will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2000 Honda FCX will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: