2000 Honda FCX vs. 1997 Citroen XM
To start off, 2000 Honda FCX is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 Citroen XM. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 Citroen XM would be higher. At 2,946 cc (6 cylinders), 1997 Citroen XM is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1997 Citroen XM (191 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 69 more horse power than 2000 Honda FCX. (122 HP @ 6600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1997 Citroen XM should accelerate faster than 2000 Honda FCX. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1997 Citroen XM weights approximately 751 kg more than 2000 Honda FCX. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1997 Citroen XM (278 Nm) has 5 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Honda FCX. (273 Nm). This means 1997 Citroen XM will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Honda FCX.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Honda FCX | 1997 Citroen XM | |
Make | Honda | Citroen |
Model | FCX | XM |
Year Released | 2000 | 1997 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 999 cc | 2946 cc |
Engine Type | electric | V |
Horse Power | 122 HP | 191 HP |
Engine RPM | 6600 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 273 Nm | 278 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 840 kg | 1591 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2860 mm |