2000 Honda FCX vs. 2003 Ford Falcon
To start off, 2003 Ford Falcon is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Honda FCX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Honda FCX would be higher. At 3,984 cc (6 cylinders), 2003 Ford Falcon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Ford Falcon (220 HP @ 4900 RPM) has 98 more horse power than 2000 Honda FCX. (122 HP @ 6600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Ford Falcon should accelerate faster than 2000 Honda FCX. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Ford Falcon weights approximately 675 kg more than 2000 Honda FCX. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2003 Ford Falcon is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2003 Ford Falcon. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Honda FCX, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Ford Falcon (357 Nm) has 84 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Honda FCX. (273 Nm). This means 2003 Ford Falcon will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Honda FCX.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Honda FCX | 2003 Ford Falcon | |
Make | Honda | Ford |
Model | FCX | Falcon |
Year Released | 2000 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 999 cc | 3984 cc |
Engine Type | electric | in-line |
Horse Power | 122 HP | 220 HP |
Engine RPM | 6600 RPM | 4900 RPM |
Torque | 273 Nm | 357 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 840 kg | 1515 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2800 mm |