2000 Honda FCX vs. 2003 Mazda 6
To start off, 2003 Mazda 6 is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Honda FCX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Honda FCX would be higher. At 1,837 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Mazda 6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Honda FCX (122 HP @ 6600 RPM) has 4 more horse power than 2003 Mazda 6. (118 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Honda FCX should accelerate faster than 2003 Mazda 6. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Mazda 6 weights approximately 570 kg more than 2000 Honda FCX.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Honda FCX (273 Nm) has 29 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Mazda 6. (244 Nm). This means 2000 Honda FCX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Mazda 6. 2000 Honda FCX has automatic transmission and 2003 Mazda 6 has manual transmission. 2003 Mazda 6 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2000 Honda FCX will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Honda FCX | 2003 Mazda 6 | |
Make | Honda | Mazda |
Model | FCX | 6 |
Year Released | 2000 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 999 cc | 1837 cc |
Engine Type | electric | in-line |
Horse Power | 122 HP | 118 HP |
Engine RPM | 6600 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 273 Nm | 244 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 840 kg | 1410 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2270 mm |